13September

The New York Times: Bell Stops Birds From Nesting In Bad Places

  • Posted By: Glenn Waldorf
  • Tags:
  • Comments: 0

In case you missed it, The New York Times quoted Bell Environmental Services as experts on bird control in its Sunday, September 11, 2016 Real Estate section.

Why Quote Bell?

Because Bell Environmental has a dedicated division named Bell Bird Control staffed with experts in bird control and remediation.  We clean up bird problems (and all that they leave behind) and prevent new issues from emerging by installing customized systems for your office, hangar, museum, power plant, military base. condominium, stadium, railroad station, and other places where birds are pests.  Our Better Engineered Longer Lasting (Hope that catch phrase makes you remember “Bell.”) systems incorporate netting, electric sensors and track that protect your building through mechanical means, but are safe for birds.  Our solutions deter and prevent birds from returning.  While birds can be beautiful, the nests and guano they leave behind can be toxic to humans. No wants to nor should be exposed to the numerous health hazards caused by birds.

What Did The New York Times Want To Know?

Every week the New York Times answers questions from readers on practical topics that affect condo, co-op owners, and renters and finds experts who share advice on how to solve them. This summer the NY Times has covered:

This week the question was on birds nesting in the HVAC units of a condominium, and therefore who and how to address clean up of these units for aesthetic and health concerns.

Where Can You Find The Article and Other Great Real Estate Tips?

Here’s a link and the relevant portion of the article on bird control in case you didn’t get through your copy of the Sunday NY Times (half of which is conveniently delivered on Saturdays)

Birds Nest in Bad Places

Credit: Michael Kolomatsky/The New York Times

Birds and Air-Conditioners

I live in a condominium with beautiful landscaping, treesand lots of birds. The air-conditioning and heating units in the apartments are vented outdoors through louvers built into the building’s brick facade. Birds nest in the spaces between the louvers and the cooling-and-heating units, leaving behind droppings and nesting material. It is messy and a health hazard, but does not damage the appliances. The board says condo owners are responsible for cleaning and removing the nests. But shouldn’t this be the board’s responsibility, since the nests are in the facade and not in the appliances?

Larchmont, N.Y.

In “The Best Nest,” a children’s book by P. D. Eastman, Mr. and Mrs. Bird explore all sorts of terrible ideas for places to build a nest — in a shoe, a mailbox, a church bell — only to be promptly evicted each time. The birds that have settled in your building have found an equally logical place to call home, albeit one that is inconvenient for you.

“They’re finding shelter,” said Dan Brady, a project manager at Bell Bird Control, of Fairfield, N.J. “They build their nest and lay their eggs, and nobody can get them.”

A bird’s nest is dirty, attracts bugs and could pose a health hazard if spores from the droppings get sucked into the ventilation system, Mr. Brady said. He suggested using bird netting or mesh cloth to keep the birds out of the louvers. A handyman could reach the louvers from inside your apartment to install the netting.

As for who should foot the bill, check your governing documents. In most cases, unless a building has central air, HVAC equipment is considered part of the individual apartments rather than the building. So repairs and maintenance would be the unit owners’ responsibility, said Lisa A. Smith, a partner at the law firm Smith, Gambrell & Russell who is based in New York.

“Although in this case the louver is separate and apart from the cooling-heating unit, it will most likely be considered part of the assembly as it is necessary in order to operate the equipment,” Ms. Smith said.

If the problem affects multiple apartments, the board could hire someone to address the issue for the entire building. Individual owners would still be billed for the work, but the cost might be lower if the building can negotiate a bulk rate for everyone.

Comments (0)